Gee, it wasn't just me who was taken aback by Pat Robertson's recent outrage. According to this NYT article Preacher Pat is being "pilloried" for his assassination comments.
I don't want to carry Hugo Chavez' water but wasn't he elected in a free and fair democratic election? Why does Pat, and for that matter this White House, hate freedom? Maybe I don't understand. I guess freedom is only good if it results in the election of governments that tow the Bush/Chaney/Rumsfeld/Rice line.